13Ἀσπάζεταί σε τὰ τέκνα τῆς ἀδελφῆς σου τῆς ἐκλεκτῆς. Ἀμήν.
Notes
*1:2δια την αληθειαν rell ¦ — [10%] [homoioteleuton]
†1:3εσται μεθ υμων f35 [48.5%] OC,CP(AV’s TR) ¦ 12 ημων ℵB,0232 [48%] RP,HF,TR,NU ¦ ~ υμιν [1.5%] ¦ — A [2%] (I imagine that the difficulty arose from the use of the future indicative with the verb ‘to be’, when the optative or subjunctive would be expected. We expect “may mercy … be with you,” not the affirmation that it will be. If “in truth and love” is understood as modifying the pronoun, then the use of the indicative is explained. Anyone who is in truth and love will have grace, mercy and peace. The 2nd person is presumably correct.)
‡1:3παρα f35 A,B,048,0232 [80%] RP,HF,OC,TR,NU ¦ απο ℵ [20%] CP
§1:3κυριου ιησου χριστου f35 ℵ (91.6%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ 23 A,B,048,0232 (6.2%) NU ¦ ~ 32 (1.2%) ¦ — (0.8%) (part of a larger omission—homoioteleuton) ¦ one other reading (Is not the reading of the eclectic text inferior?)
§1:5εχομεν f35 [32%] ¦ ειχομεν (ℵA)B,048 [68%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU [Understood as part of a parenthetical aside, the present makes good sense; render “(not as though writing a new commandment to you, but one that we have from the beginning)”.]
*1:6εστιν η εντολη f35 (ℵ)048 [85%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 231 A,B,0232 [15%] NU
§1:8απολαβωμεν f35 (76.1%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ απολαβομεν (5.2%) ¦ απολαβητε ℵA,B,0232v (17.9%) NU ¦ απολαβετε (0.6%) ¦ one other variant (0.2%)
*1:9παραβαινων f35 (99%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ προαγων ℵA,B,048,0232 (1%) NU (Is not the ‘Alexandrian’ reading inferior?)
†1:9δε f35 [20%] ¦ — ℵA,B [80%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (Would not John, a Jew, be more likely to write the conjunction?)
‡1:9του χριστου f35 (89.6%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,048 (4.4%) NU ¦ part of a larger omission—homoioteleuton (6%) (The ‘Alexandrian’ omission agrees nicely with their notions of style.)
†1:12η πεπληρωμενη f35 A,048v [98.5%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 21 B [1.5%] NU ¦ ~ 1 ην ℵ
‡1:13αμην f35 (89.4%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,048 (8.8%) NU ¦ η χαρις μετα σου (0.4%) ¦ η χαρις μετα σου 1 (1.4%) [See the last footnote in Jude.]
δια την αληθειαν rell ¦ — [10%] [homoioteleuton]
εσται μεθ υμων f35 [48.5%] OC,CP(AV’s TR) ¦ 12 ημων ℵB,0232 [48%] RP,HF,TR,NU ¦ ~ υμιν [1.5%] ¦ — A [2%] (I imagine that the difficulty arose from the use of the future indicative with the verb ‘to be’, when the optative or subjunctive would be expected. We expect “may mercy … be with you,” not the affirmation that it will be. If “in truth and love” is understood as modifying the pronoun, then the use of the indicative is explained. Anyone who is in truth and love will have grace, mercy and peace. The 2nd person is presumably correct.)
παρα f35 A,B,048,0232 [80%] RP,HF,OC,TR,NU ¦ απο ℵ [20%] CP
κυριου ιησου χριστου f35 ℵ (91.6%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ 23 A,B,048,0232 (6.2%) NU ¦ ~ 32 (1.2%) ¦ — (0.8%) (part of a larger omission—homoioteleuton) ¦ one other reading (Is not the reading of the eclectic text inferior?)
περιπατουντας rell ¦ περιπατουντα [15%]
γραφων σοι καινην f35 B (73.8%) RP,HF,OC,CP ¦ γραφω 23 (12.9%) TR ¦ ~ 312 ℵA,048 (8.9%) NU ¦ ~ 3 γραφω 2 (3.6%) ¦ four other variants (0.8%)
εχομεν f35 [32%] ¦ ειχομεν (ℵA)B,048 [68%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU [Understood as part of a parenthetical aside, the present makes good sense; render “(not as though writing a new commandment to you, but one that we have from the beginning)”.]
εστιν η εντολη f35 (ℵ)048 [85%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 231 A,B,0232 [15%] NU
απολαβωμεν f35 (76.1%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ απολαβομεν (5.2%) ¦ απολαβητε ℵA,B,0232v (17.9%) NU ¦ απολαβετε (0.6%) ¦ one other variant (0.2%)
παραβαινων f35 (99%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ προαγων ℵA,B,048,0232 (1%) NU (Is not the ‘Alexandrian’ reading inferior?)
δε f35 [20%] ¦ — ℵA,B [80%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (Would not John, a Jew, be more likely to write the conjunction?)
του χριστου f35 (89.6%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,048 (4.4%) NU ¦ part of a larger omission—homoioteleuton (6%) (The ‘Alexandrian’ omission agrees nicely with their notions of style.)