†16:22ιησουν χριστον f35 [98%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,C [2%] NU
‡16:23κυριου f35 ℵB,C [70%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ 1 ημων A [30%]
§16:23χριστου f35 A,C [97%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵB [3%] NU
*16:24αμην f35 ℵA,C [98%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — B [2%] NU
†16:24The citation of f35 is based on thirty-four MSS—18, 35, 141, 201, 204, 386, 394, 444, 604, 757, 824, 928, 986, 1072, 1075, 1100, 1249, 1503, 1548, 1637, 1761, 1855, 1864, 1865, 1892, 1897, 2080, 2352, 2431, 2466, 2554, 2587, 2723 and 2817—all of which I collated myself. 2554 is a ‘perfect’ representative of f35 in 1 Corinthians, as it stands. 2723 has three variations from the presumed archetype, 35 also has three (but 35’s exemplar only had one), 18 has five (but its exemplar only had two); the exemplar of 141 had one, that of 2466 had three, and so on. For a book this size the uniformity is impressive. Since these MSS come from all over the Mediterranean world (Sinai, Jerusalem, Patmos, Aegean, Bucharest, Constantinople, Trikala, Meteora, Athens, Mt. Athos [eight different monasteries], Grottaferrata, Vatican, etc.) they are certainly representative of the family, giving us the precise family profile—it is reflected in the Text without exception. In the statements of evidence I have included the percentage of manuscript attestation for each variant within either ( ) or [ ]. I have used ( ) for the evidence taken from TuT, which I take to be reasonably precise. For the variant sets that are not covered there I used Reuben Swanson’s excellent collations (New Testament Greek Manuscripts: 1 Corinthians [Ed. Reuben Swanson, Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 2005]). For 1 Corinthians Swanson collated 83 MSS, six being fragmentary (for any given variant set there will usually be at least 75 MSS listed), and I occasionally supplemented from Scrivener and von Soden—the percentages offered, I have used [ ] for these, are extrapolations based on a comparison of these sources. I venture to predict, if complete collations ever become available, that for any non-Byzantine variants listed with 5 to 1% support (in my apparatus) the margin of error should not exceed ±1%; for non-Byzantine variants listed with 10 to 6% support the margin of error should hardly exceed ±2%; where there is some division among the Byzantine witnesses the margin of error should rarely exceed ±10%—by comparing Swanson with TuT, I believe one can make a fairly accurate extrapolation. However, I guarantee the witness of Family 35. Please see the last footnote for Matthew for further information.
φουρτουνατου f35 [85%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ φορτουνατου 𝕻46ℵA,B,C [15%] NU
υμων f35 𝕻46ℵA [98%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ υμετερον B,C [2%] NU
ασπαζονται f35 𝕻46B [96%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ασπαζεται ℵC [2%] NU,some TRs ¦ four other readings [2%] ¦ A omits the whole verse [homoioteleuton]
πρισκιλλα f35 C [98%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ πρισκα ℵB [1.5%] NU ¦ πρεισκας 𝕻46 ¦ — A see above
ημων f35 [58%] ¦ — ℵA,B,C [42%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP,NU
ιησουν χριστον f35 [98%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,C [2%] NU
κυριου f35 ℵB,C [70%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ 1 ημων A [30%]
χριστου f35 A,C [97%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵB [3%] NU
αμην f35 ℵA,C [98%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — B [2%] NU
The citation of f35 is based on thirty-four MSS—18, 35, 141, 201, 204, 386, 394, 444, 604, 757, 824, 928, 986, 1072, 1075, 1100, 1249, 1503, 1548, 1637, 1761, 1855, 1864, 1865, 1892, 1897, 2080, 2352, 2431, 2466, 2554, 2587, 2723 and 2817—all of which I collated myself. 2554 is a ‘perfect’ representative of f35 in 1 Corinthians, as it stands. 2723 has three variations from the presumed archetype, 35 also has three (but 35’s exemplar only had one), 18 has five (but its exemplar only had two); the exemplar of 141 had one, that of 2466 had three, and so on. For a book this size the uniformity is impressive. Since these MSS come from all over the Mediterranean world (Sinai, Jerusalem, Patmos, Aegean, Bucharest, Constantinople, Trikala, Meteora, Athens, Mt. Athos [eight different monasteries], Grottaferrata, Vatican, etc.) they are certainly representative of the family, giving us the precise family profile—it is reflected in the Text without exception. In the statements of evidence I have included the percentage of manuscript attestation for each variant within either ( ) or [ ]. I have used ( ) for the evidence taken from TuT, which I take to be reasonably precise. For the variant sets that are not covered there I used Reuben Swanson’s excellent collations (New Testament Greek Manuscripts: 1 Corinthians [Ed. Reuben Swanson, Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 2005]). For 1 Corinthians Swanson collated 83 MSS, six being fragmentary (for any given variant set there will usually be at least 75 MSS listed), and I occasionally supplemented from Scrivener and von Soden—the percentages offered, I have used [ ] for these, are extrapolations based on a comparison of these sources. I venture to predict, if complete collations ever become available, that for any non-Byzantine variants listed with 5 to 1% support (in my apparatus) the margin of error should not exceed ±1%; for non-Byzantine variants listed with 10 to 6% support the margin of error should hardly exceed ±2%; where there is some division among the Byzantine witnesses the margin of error should rarely exceed ±10%—by comparing Swanson with TuT, I believe one can make a fairly accurate extrapolation. However, I guarantee the witness of Family 35. Please see the last footnote for Matthew for further information.