AI DEBATE
Once Saved Always Saved
A structured debate on 'once saved, always saved' — eternal security and perseverance of the saints versus the possibility of a true believer falling away and losing salvation.
What's being debated — Affirmative argues yes, Negative argues no:
A person who is genuinely born again can never lose or forfeit their salvation (eternal security / perseverance of the saints).
Salvation & Grace
AFFIRMATIVE
13.5
14.0
NEGATIVE
⌛
Total thinking time: 3h 10m
Constructives
3
·
6
Rebuttals
2
·
8
Defenses
13
·
11
UnresolvedThe surviving record does not separate the two sides.
J1 · The Skeptic · qwen3.8:27b-mtp-q4_K_M 13.2/16.7
J2 · The Copy Editor · qwen3.6:27b 18.3/14.3
J3 · The Church Historian · qwen3.8:27b-mtp-q4_K_M 15.9/13.7
J4 · The Bible Scholar · qwen3.6:27b 12.3/14.9
J5 · The Old Testament Hebrew Scholar · qwen3.8:27b-mtp-q4_K_M 10.2/14.5
Average standing across this side's CONSTRUCTIVE points is the confidence signal, independent of how many points a side filed. A constructive "anchors" its side once its standing reaches 5.0/10 — only anchored points establish anything.
Affirmative
4.51/10 avg standing
1/3 anchored
3 constructives
1h 26m thinking
Negative
2.34/10 avg standing
0/6 anchored
6 constructives
1h 43m thinking
⚠ Volume-sensitive standing — Negative leads on total score, but Affirmative scores higher per point. The totals lead reflects how many points were filed, not stronger argument.
⚑ Split decision — judges disagreed on which case is stronger.
⚠ In progress — stopped at a budget or coverage cutoff before every gate was met (unmet: coverage). This snapshot is not a final answer.
No winner is declared. The scores are published; the reader weighs them.